Posts Tagged ‘investment’

Inefficient Market Hypothesis

Saturday, December 27th, 2008

The financial markets are touted as being efficient by most leading economists.  A large faction of economists tend to disagree and claim that the markets are only mostly efficient because humans are not fully rational agents.

An efficient market is one where all available information is accounted for in the price of an assett or good.  If there is a deal to be found, then it has already been found by someone else.   For instance, car dealership XYZ misprints a coupon and offers a $50k BMW for $25k to the first buyer.  An efficient market hypothesis formulates that someone else will arrive as quickly as possible to snatch up the good deal.

An inefficient market is one where prices do not take into account all available information, or one in which the participating agents don’t make the most logical decisions.  As in the above example the dealership offers a brand new BMW for 50% off… a great deal!  But suppose they make the offer on Saturday in a 100% Orthodox community.  Orthodox Jews can not handle money on the Sabbath and thus the BMW goes unpurchased until Sunday leaving the random out of town straggler to stumble upon the deal of a lifetime.

Aside from quirks like the above, the markets are usually efficient.  If there is a deal to be had, it will be had. But I’d like to formulate my own hypothesis on inefficiency which stems from my understanding of the human psyche.

Markets are inefficient because human decisions are influenced by the following: overestimated future extraction of the good of an asset, greater fear of loss than hope at an equal sized gain, pride of ownership.

1.)  Humans are extremely biased creatures.  We have to be.  In order to survive it’s necessary to make decisions without all of the data.  This means bias.  When it comes to a purchase or investment humans continue the pattern.  Many of our purchase or investment decisions are made by comparing a list of highly complex options.  Once the decision has been made (just go for it) the mind then plays the trick of soothing the resulting anxiety (did I make the right decision?) by hyping up the enjoyment that the purchase or investment will bring in the future.  As the future has not arrived yet it’s perfectly understandable to assume that product X or investment Y will bring us more fun or wealth than we ever imagined.  This is not rational and leads to inefficiencies in the market.

2.) Humans fear loss far more than they hope for an equal sized gain.  If you were to take a survey of 1,000 people and ask them to value what their right arm was worth, take the average amount and triple it you’d still find that almost all of those surveyed would still rather keep their right arm than exchange it for the money.  In another example we can take marriage.  A young man dating a beautiful young woman often balks at the idea of marriage until he loses the potential bride, simply because the fear of the loss of other potentially better brides is greater than the hope of living a long and happy life with a beautiful and smart woman[1].  We hate risk, irrationally so, and it causes inefficiencies in the markets.

3.)  Humans love to be owners.  And once we own something, our mere ownership causes the item to become more valuable.  Our pride in ownership is purely an emotional state which is the result of our inborn need to nurture.  We are built to love, nurture and cultivate.  It’s how God (or Evolution if you insist) designed us.  Give us a baby, we feed it, a dog and we pet it, a plant and we water it, a car and we change the oil, a house and we fix it, some stock in a company and we watch it “grow”.  It is this irrational attachment to our friends, children and even things that has allowed us to continue from generation to generation, but it also causes inefficiencies in the market place.

What does this all add up to?  It adds up to two consequences:

Inefficiencies cause bubbles and bursts…mass movements towards and away from investments and goods fueled by irrationality. The bad thing about inefficient markets is that you may get caught in the burst unprepared.  But the great thing is that inefficient markets provide opportunities for gain.

The main lesson is don’t be afraid about an economic crisis… it’s irrational… and besides it’s likely that another bubble is forming somewhere.  If you’re quick you can probably catch it on the upswing!

  1. I also wonder, from an economic perspective a good woman is worth far more than her weight in gold, quite literally, why then would a man prefer to live the single uncommitted life? []

Hedging your investments… explained

Wednesday, November 12th, 2008

When most think of hedge funds they think of big fat cats sitting around in some office with billions at their disposal rolling the dice on risky futures and derivatives.   While this might be true in some cases it doesn’t explain what a hedge, or a hedgefund does.  And let’s start by eliminating the obvious… a hedgefund does not invest in thick bushes that line driveways :-)

Any investment can be considered a hedge if it helps to reduce the risk of overall loss due to a seperate (usually larger) investment.

The best way to think about a hedge investment is with an example that we should all know very well, cars and car insurance.

When one purchases a vehicle there are two financial sums at risk… the vehicle itself and the damage caused to others or yourself in an accident.  It may happen that while I’m driving my $50k hummer down the highway I, oblivious to the rest of the world, crash into another Hummer (who is equally oblivious to the real world).  Since the accident is my fault I’m now on the hook for my hummer, the other hummer and all medical bills… let’s say $200k all together.  Luckily I hedged against catastrophic loss by taking out a comprehensive auto-insurance policy for $100 a month… they pay for everything.  I’m free to return to my irresponsible hummer driving ways!

Notice that for $100 a month, my hedge has the ability to pay out $200k when a predefined event occurs, this is called leverage: the ability for a small sum of money to control a large sum.

Hedging is not limited to insurance though.  In the stock market one can easily hedge against significant loss via Put and Call options.  If I sell a Put option to some other investor, we’ve agreed that I can “put” my stock on him (sell it to him) for an agreed upon price.  In exchange for the risk that the Put option buyer takes on, I agree to pay him a small fee…say 5% of my stock’s value.  When my stock shoots up 10% the put option gives me no advantage and I keep my stock.   But perhaps it loses 20%… I then shovel off the stock to the purchaser of the put contract for its agreed upon value.  Now instead of losing 20%, I’ve only lost 5%.

Notice:  5% of the stock’s original value creates a contract to control 100% of it’s value.  Again, we see leverage here.

A Call option works the other way, it is an agreement between me and a holder of some stock such that I can “call” him up and purchase the stock for an agreed upon price.  In this case I pay the owner 5% to buy the stock at a certain price.  When the price of the stock shoots up and above our agreed upon price by 20% I excercise my option to buy and purchase the stock for a 20% discount.  If the stock fails to increase in value the owner of the stock makes a 5% profit and I lose the nominal value of the call option.

Again, for 5% I can gain control of 100%.

The essential feature here is that I can take on another’s risk or dish out some of my risk for profit.  No problems here with massive default.

However, what if I don’t have stock to sell options on or the money to purchase the asset indicated in the contract?  I can go naked! wooohooo!!

No not that kind of naked.  Going naked means that you sell someone the option to “put” stock on you without having the money to pay for that stock (which would cause a default on your side).  Likewise you can also sell the right for someone to “call” you on your stock.  In both cases you collect the 5% fee, but you’d better hope that the conditions don’t force you to to have to purchase the requisite amount of stock in order to fulfill the contract[1].

Selling naked options is not hedging, it’s highly leveraged speculation and is ill-advised.

Hedging is not limited to what has been shown above.  Almost any investment can be a hedge as long as it protects against loss from another investment … the possibilities are almost limitless, for example: biodiesel hedges against rising oil, hay bails against rising drywall costs, Japanese steel against American Steel, Apple vs. Microsoft etc.

Perhaps one of the most common hedges in the average person’s life (besides car insurance) is the common resume and occasional job application.  That’s right, hedge against income and job loss by keeping one foot in the door of another company… it only takes a little bit of your time.

  1. this is called securities fraud and => jail []